NJ S810

Airsoft safety discussion. Post here with questions about laws and safety concerns.

NJ S810

Postby code789 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:51 am

link to news article:
http://www.airsoft2day.com/news/655-bil ... earms.html

This bill would clarify that “airsoft” guns constitute firearms and therefore are subject to this State’s strict laws regulating the sale, possession, and use of firearms. Airsoft guns are replica firearms used primarily for sporting and recreational purposes, including military games. They use compressed-air, gas, or spring or electric-operated pistons to shoot non-metallic pellets or balls. Because these guns shoot plastic rather than metal pellets, it is not clear under current law whether they are considered firearms similar to “BB” guns. Therefore, the bill revises the definition of a firearm by specifying that any air gun, spring gun, gun utilizing a gas or electric-operated piston, pistol, including one that is shoulder-fired, or similar weapon which ejects a pellet or ball made of polymer or metallic-coated polymer constitutes a firearm. Under this revised definition, airsoft guns would be considered firearms and regulated similar to BB guns. For example, a person would have to be at least 21 years of age to purchase an airsoft handgun or 18 years of age to purchase airsoft rifles. The person also would have to obtain a permit to purchase the gun, pass a criminal background check, and not be subject to any disqualifications for firearms ownership


just glancing through the abstract this kind of reminds me of the British laws on airsoft
Sic vis pacem, para bellum
long live the republic
User avatar
code789
Ranger
Ranger
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 844
Age: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:49 pm
Location: salem

Postby CommieHunter » Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:36 pm

This is a little ridiculous that States have this type of a view of airsoft replicas.
Image
User avatar
CommieHunter
1337
1337
 
Team: SOTA
Posts: 6787
Age: 37
Images: 24
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Beaverton, OR

Re: NJ S810

Postby Matt » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:12 pm

a person would have to be at least 21 years of age to purchase an airsoft handgun or 18 years of age to purchase airsoft rifles. The person also would have to obtain a permit to purchase the gun, pass a criminal background check, and not be subject to any disqualifications for firearms ownership


I like it! Where can I vote YES?

Let's think seriously about this. Airsoft guns are INCORRECTLY classified as toys to avoid additional cost in import taxes. They are not TOYS. This is America, there's 100s of real firearms to confuse these with. It's not like Japan or China where the average citizen can't even own a real gun. We need a clear definition by law of what an Airsoft replica is. Is it a firearm? Is it a sporting goods product? It's definitely NOT a toy.

In order to keep selling and distributing REALISTIC Airsoft replica guns here in the United States.... Something like this has to happen. We just have to make sure it's done in a way that benefits us. No sweeping FPS limits, no requirements on size or color of the replica. If it's a firearm, let's have it as realistic as possible then.
Image
User avatar
Matt
1337
1337
 
Team: APST
Posts: 9651
Age: 43
Images: 12159
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Ivan Daylovich™ » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:19 pm

I think it is a toy. There is no reason a toy can't be dangerous.

http://gizmodo.com/5849871/12-nuclear-t ... /gallery/1
Image
User avatar
Ivan Daylovich™
1337
1337
 
Team: {FAG}
Posts: 3365
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Poland

Postby Matt » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:25 pm

LOL. I think it comes down to this: Should a parent leave their child unsupervised with this product? If the answer is no, it's not a toy. 80% of the bad news press about Airsoft involves kids who are unsupervised with Airsoft guns.

It's something that's obviously lost in translation from Asia to America. Our kids are fat little bastards who shoot the neighbor's dog with an AEG and then get real guns drawn on them by the local PD when the neighbors call.
Image
User avatar
Matt
1337
1337
 
Team: APST
Posts: 9651
Age: 43
Images: 12159
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Ivan Daylovich™ » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:31 pm

Some kids can be left alone. My brother and I were smart and lived on a farm though, so we're probably the exception.

The difference in opinions here is the definition of toy, not on what should be done. I agree with you there.
Last edited by Ivan Daylovich™ on Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Ivan Daylovich™
1337
1337
 
Team: {FAG}
Posts: 3365
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Poland

Re: NJ S810

Postby Steve » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:32 pm

+1, Matt.

Airsoft replicas are not toys, and should not be treated as such.

Now, the interesting question then becomes, if they are treated as firearms by statute, and the replicas are of NFA-controlled items, does that mean that NJ airsofters will need tax stamps for their AEGs? And since the ATF doesn't currently issue tax stamps for AEGs, does that mean they would need to be registered as AOWs? Or just forbidden in some nebulous no-mans-land of legislation?
This Week In Airsoft wrote:This Week in Airsoft stands behind its statement... The internet and YouTube can be your teacher.

Image
Steve
1337
1337
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 2133
Age: 46
Images: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:01 am
Location: NOLA, muthaf*ckers. Winter can eat a d*ck.

Postby Ivan Daylovich™ » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:37 pm

I was gonna ask if they'd be protected under the Second Amendment, but then remember we don't have one anymore.
Image
User avatar
Ivan Daylovich™
1337
1337
 
Team: {FAG}
Posts: 3365
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:39 am
Location: Poland

Postby Archangel 06 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:40 pm

Next question - because they are often fully automatic, will you need a Class 3 License to own them?
Nasty wrote:TM preforms so well because all TM's have little fairies living in the hopups and gearboxes that give awesome accuracy, but as soon as you take them apart and modify them, the fairies fly away.

It is common knowledge.
User avatar
Archangel 06
Soldier
Soldier
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 380
Age: 31
Images: 2
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:02 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Matt » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:43 pm

Here's the only thing about this bill that concerns me:

Bob Smith runs another Bill S811 that will categorize the act of adding or removing an orange muzzle tip to a real firearm or airsoft gun as a crime of the fourth degree. The law says that a crime of the fourth degree is punishable by a fine up to $10,000 or imprisonment for about 18 months; or both.


If they are going to require permits to buy them, call them firearms, and require a criminal background check.... They shouldn't require an orange flash-hider.
Image
User avatar
Matt
1337
1337
 
Team: APST
Posts: 9651
Age: 43
Images: 12159
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby McNair » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:47 pm

But they want the orange tips so people know they're toys, Matt.
User avatar
McNair
1337
1337
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 7114
Age: 41
Images: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: Vernonia, OR

Postby CommieHunter » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:55 pm

I can see giving airsoft guns their own section of legislation, but I think this particular setup is the wrong way to do it. By calling them firearms, you subject them to hundreds of other laws that pertain to firearms, including possession by a felon, the aforementioned ATF laws on short barreled and AOW items, the aforementioned orange tip issue, etc.

The only way this makes sense is if you have a competent policymaker who understands what airsoft is and what the application of it is and makes it clear that they are not under the same restrictions as firearms.

Can you imagine the trouble if someone who doesn't have a CHL gets arrested at an airsoft field and prosecuted because they had an airsoft pistol, now a 'real firearm' concealed in their bag with no permit?

It's one thing to give them a specific classification, much like air rifles have. It's another totally different thing to call them firearms.
Image
User avatar
CommieHunter
1337
1337
 
Team: SOTA
Posts: 6787
Age: 37
Images: 24
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Beaverton, OR

Postby Evil Zergling137 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:58 pm

They are Toys. I can't believe people here actually want them regulated.

Paintball guns are toys too. Looking like a real weapon from a distance doesn't make it any less a toy.
Evil Zergling137
Soldier
Soldier
 
Team: N/A
Posts: 321
Age: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:46 pm

Postby Matt » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:11 pm

I get your other points, but I see nothing wrong with felons not being allowed to own Airsoft guns.
Image
User avatar
Matt
1337
1337
 
Team: APST
Posts: 9651
Age: 43
Images: 12159
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 3:32 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Postby Jester316 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:16 pm

Matt wrote:I get your other points, but I see nothing wrong with felons or kids not being allowed to own Airsoft guns.


Fixed.
Image

FIRE CLEANSES ALL!
User avatar
Jester316
1337
1337
 
Team: SpecDet1
Posts: 5858
Age: 36
Images: 7
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:26 am
Location: Beaverton

Next

Return to Safety/Legality

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests