Classic Army M15A4 Rifle Review

[Guilty]

wow i have never heard of a classic army shooting that hight stock?

[bajablast]

i think it is about thier quality control, it must not be very good.

[BassBeastBranzell]

Thanks a bunch for your reviews on the CA M15A4 rifle and the TM M16A2 rifle. They helped me choose my first AEG alot. Up until recently id been using nothing but springers with my buddies in my back yard for years now but that all changed when i saw/fired my cousins CA M15A4 Carbine ( otherwise known as the M4 ) I then decided i wanted an AEG but i couldnt decide between the Classic Army and the Tokyo Marui, having heard all the greatness of Marui but having shot a Classic Army. I opted for the CA m15A4 rifle over the TM and i really appreciate all of your feedback on the two weapons. Thanks again.

[Seagreen]

Having plenty of experience with the models, Im sure you made the best decision. The new CA's are superior to the TM's.

The only drawback I see with the CA is the piston. It is very brittle. It will wear out at a quicker rate than say a stock TM piston. Other than that, CA is a far nicer piece of kit for nominally more funds.

[BassBeastBranzell]

thanks man. Any way i can repair the piston or any ideas on a good replacement?

[KN8898]

I've had my ICS MP5A4 for around a year now and its still in great shape but I've been looking around for my next AEG. I was leaning to the M4/M15 range and was looking mostly at CA. After reading the review I'm almost 100% set on getting the CA M15A4. I'm still gonna be waiting around for a few months though until I order it up.

Thanks for the review!

[DeathkillerCOBB]

Great review, I own it and would say just the same thing.

[NightArk]

Well written. I'm seiously lokking at that as my first AEG.

~Isaiah

[mmmsammichmaker]

CCCOMBO BREAKING NECROPOST