Gamma AT4 Launcher

[Riddick]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJQRDJDhAw&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

I considered buying one for LOW III but Deep Fire just released theirs and it's only $300 ($160ish cheaper)

So I will wait to see which one is better.

[Beran]

the deep fire LAW was a piece of shit. that was a few years ago though, maybe they made this one better.

[Riddick]

the deep fire LAW was a piece of shit. that was a few years ago though, maybe they made this one better.

Yeah I remember that turd

[Payback]

That would be fun with nerf rockets.



Also, nice boobies he had.

[Mini-Marine]

I've been wanting one of these for a while.

Now they actually make them!

Once I can finally stop working these retarded hours and start playing again, I think I may very well pick one up.

[BlacksunshineGAAS]

I've been trying to get my DF rep to send me one of these. If I can make that happen I will share a review with you guys.

[Snake_Eyes]

Very cool, and very accurate as well!

[Switchback]

I seem to recall another one of these just a little bit ago...didn't it suck (looks at RPG-7, cringes, looks at AT4, sees RPG-7, Cringes, repeat)?
It would probably be sick with a CO2 shell and a Nerf football/practice foam golf balls.

[MitchD]

If you could get any sort of range out of them to make then useful, it would be cool, but how to do that and remain safe to use is what I'd like to see before I'd even consider buying that thing.

[Mini-Marine]

I'd imagine you can get the same sort of range out of it as you do with an M203, seeing as how it is the same thing just housed in a much bigger package.

The only real use I could see for it (other than it looking bleeding awesome) would be for taking out enemy vehicles or fortifications in some sort of scenario game. Using M203s to take out what are supposed to be armored vehicles I always found to be somewhat cheesy

[Beran]

The only real use I could see for it (other than it looking f***ing awesome) would be for taking out enemy vehicles or fortifications in some sort of scenario game. Using M203s to take out what are supposed to be armored vehicles I always found to be somewhat cheesy

i always justified it in the back of my mind as being one of the M433 HEDP 40mm rounds.

[Switchback]

I'd imagine you can get the same sort of range out of it as you do with an M203, seeing as how it is the same thing just housed in a much bigger package.

I thought that the more space the gas had to expand, the higher the velocity? This should have more range, I think.

[Jester316]

The same amount of gas expanding in a large space will DECREASE the velocity. You need MORE gas to INCREASE the velocity.

Same reason why tight bore barrels INCREASE fps.

[Mini-Marine]

I'd imagine you can get the same sort of range out of it as you do with an M203, seeing as how it is the same thing just housed in a much bigger package.

I thought that the more space the gas had to expand, the higher the velocity? This should have more range, I think.

Up to a point, if the barrel is too short, much of the gas ends up being wasted, if it is too long, the gas pressure begins to drop before the round has left the barrel.

It's really going to depend on the volume of gas and the length of barrel you've got.

[Snake_Eyes]

Maybe MOD it?