CommieHunter wrote:By the way, do not judge KWA on the broken hop-up issue. It was not a factory problem, so I would not attribute it to KWA's record.
Nasty wrote:ROGUEDETAIL wrote:i have a G&G combat machine and it works great, no jams or failures. Yours was probably just a lemon. But anyway back on topic, i think KWA are better internally but CA are better with externals. IMO of coarse.
I've never owned one, but I have personally worked on 6 G&G M4s, and I will say that with the exception of the stock barrel, which is a tighter bore than most, the internals are not on the same level as CA and KWA. And ROGUEDETAIL, have you personally worked on the internals of your G&G, or are you going off of hearsay?
Now, this has probably been said in this thread before, but I think a large part of the "KWAs RULE!!!" mentality is how they are marketed. KWA doesn't show off external or internal quality, what they STRESS is that it's "400 FPS and LIPO READY" out of the box. I whole-heartedly believe that this continues the belief that FPS= Performance. But the flip side of that is that I believe KWA markets to newer players (such as by showing off their FPS), and thus a lot of the internal problems could be attributed to user error. But still, I do not believe that a KWA's alleged ability to shoot 400 FPS and take a lipo out of the box means that it's internals are better than those of CA guns.
What Jester said about KWA being a newer company for AEGs I agree with. CA has really good externals, and has had the time to develop and improve their internals, whereas KWA is newer and is still running in to problems as they develop.The only thing better would be a KWA you could swap out to switch between CQB velocities and MOUT games. Then one gun could do it all....for less.
Or you can get an ICS. I can switch out from 280 FPS to 380 FPS in about 15 seconds.
CommieHunter wrote:I know the exact cause of the hop unit issue, and it was not an assembly problem. They weren't broken from the distributor. It was caused by use of certain aftermarket parts. Yes, it was when the gun was new out of the box, but the part that was installed was causing the issue.
Nasty wrote:"LiPo-ready" marketing doesn't mean s**t.
Eudorus wrote:...and simply show up and shoot everyone since all of these assholes are running around on our island.
Eudorus wrote:...and simply show up and shoot everyone since all of these assholes are running around on our island.
Eudorus wrote:...and simply show up and shoot everyone since all of these assholes are running around on our island.
PLANofMAN wrote:On september 18, 2009, KWA issued a press release informing customers that all M4's shipped after that date would have the new version 2 gearbox, which is heavily reinforced, with 9mm bearings, etc.
Has anyone had one of the new gearboxes break on them yet? 'Cause I've been hearing alot of complaints about KWA's gearbox, but I'm guessing those were the version 1's.
http://www.kwausa.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=1501
Here's a link to the info.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests