Events You'd Like to See in the Future

[Millwe5]

Bring on the campaigns!!

[acid]

my vote went to more large force on force ops.

but i think it would be cool if we put on some other stuff rather than "save the world from the nuke" or "rescue the downed pilet"

i think we should do some world war II games or vietnam games.

[Fury]

It is such a toss up for me. I love the competitions, but love all day balls to the wall OP's. But voted for team on team competitions.

[CommonSnipe]

I love the big force on force Ops. But I believe that we can utilize some of the other events to make them better.

Trainings, workshops, and team building excersises will benifit all the teams. If all teams are trained better they will be able to provide better support and opposition durning the big Ops we enjoy. And atleast in theory we will have fewer problems with the teams not calling hits and they will help police the newer players.

I think team competitions will be a great addition also. It will give the organized teams bragging rights and something to work for. Also the rankings will help in sorting the teams for the big Ops so we have evenly matched side, which will help the big games apeal to more players.

As for ongoing campain style competitions, those will also be a nice addition.

[NeoN]

cypriot being the first and last one ive been to... it still kicked a$$!!!!!

[saddaminator]

my vote went to more large force on force ops.



i think we should do some world war II games or vietnam games.

w3rd. i love WWII/nam milsim

[BentleyCntlGT]

Hey Dantes, if AP hosts another game like Cypriot Ridge sometime in the next few months would 13 year olds be allowed as long as they had all the required gear?

[acid]

Hey Dantes, if AP hosts another game like Cypriot Ridge sometime in the next few months would 13 year olds be allowed as long as they had all the required gear?

my guess?

probably not.

sorry kid.

[sk8erkingdsz]

I'm up for some ongoing campaign style things.

[NightArk]

Bring on the campaigns!!

[nemesis]

my vote went towards large force on force. maybe imcorperating aspects and other rules from other people OPs would benefit. Example i really like how during the kitty paws 48 if you didn't know what the orders were or who had the orders a admin could send you back to respawn.

[Ginocide]

I like the idea of more team games and training, but voted for training and workshops because of it's small showing. I also like the idea of having large ops but having it seperated by sides, then seperated further by teams, a little more like millitary divisions (not literally like the XXth division but as the act of dividing and organizing forces). So as a team you would see or engage other teams which you would have to identify as friend or foe by radio or otherwise, and if neccesary radio backup from other teams that are not also entangled with other forces. Not just 50 vs. 50 w00t gogogo!

[Vidar]

I vote for more ongoing campaigns, but in the form of large force-on-force games, just having a storyline that continues between games, and changes depending on who wins a game. I think that each big OP should be planned based on the results of the last one. Like, if force 1 wins, then the next game, they get to have a big entrenched base, and force 2 has to root them out. That kind of thing.

[Lord Xineohp]

I vote all out war. Two teams, one goal, one huge battle. Lets just play some airsoft.

[Vidar]

Omfg. Why don't you check post dates? Somebody please close this.