http://shop.ehobbyasia.com/aeg/ares-pps ... rifle.html
I thought you all would like to know.
Chairman wrote:That's pretty awesome. Seems like it would drain the battery really fast, though.
DMitri wrote:Chairman wrote:That's pretty awesome. Seems like it would drain the battery really fast, though.
The tension on the spring responsible for accelerating the piston is going to be multitudes higher than the return spring of the blow-back action.
You should be more concerned with there being more moving parts to break, rather than the extra battery consumption.
Osprey wrote:I'm sorry I didn't know I had to hear to read a postMcNair wrote:Are you guys really that f***ing daft?
G36 FTW wrote:The G&G mp5 is not the same as the CYMA mp5's blowback system.
It’s pneumatic, and has nothing to do with a hook on the piston; and everyone underestimates the pneumatic blowback. It goes ALL the way back on my mp5, and never locks open after shooting full auto unlike the hook-piston blowback guns do. Just needed to clear some things up.
And I agree that the star ppsh is probably a hook-and-piston design.
Nesta wrote:[Edit]not G&G[/Edit] STFU and thanks for not contributing anything to the conversation
If you would like to debate the virtues of Pneumatic BB or nit pick about 3 characters in a post I made, feel free, but here we are talking about the star PPSh-41
Osprey wrote:I'm sorry I didn't know I had to hear to read a postMcNair wrote:Are you guys really that f***ing daft?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests