binarypunisher wrote:All operational photos that have been published recently include a darker helmet scheme. The lighter rustoleum color contrasts with the rest of the kit...aka a bad thing.
Stuff that was previously illustrative of Ranger Batt (Rustoleum helmets, ACUs, PVS14s, unpainted weapons) is no longer - I imagine part of it has to do with the change in theatres, and the different challenges Afghanistan poses.
Not to argue with you at all, My brother and Bestfriend are Rangers and My brother is heading back to Iraq next month!ravenger wrote:Hoff wrote:The US Army uses Glocks?
Yes, my friend in the 2nd Ranger Battalion confirmed this.
Extreme Rice wrote:Not to argue with you at all, My brother and Bestfriend are Rangers and My brother is heading back to Iraq next month!ravenger wrote:Hoff wrote:The US Army uses Glocks?
Yes, my friend in the 2nd Ranger Battalion confirmed this.
He told me Rangers do not use glocks because of there Inaccuracy, I dont know were you got this from but its inaccurate. I think you should check your source again!. Just my two cents. . .
Nasty wrote:Snowman wrote:How do you say Glocks are inaccurate? I have 2, subcompacts, and I love their accuracy.
/off topic
Oh dude they're totally inaccurate! That's why they're one of the most common brands carried by LEOs!
Jewish Ninja wrote:Nasty wrote:Snowman wrote:How do you say Glocks are inaccurate? I have 2, subcompacts, and I love their accuracy.
/off topic
Oh dude they're totally inaccurate! That's why they're one of the most common brands carried by LEOs!
Thats just because they are cheap
Nasty wrote:Does anyone know if Rangers use Paraclete Plate Carriers?
Snowman wrote:Btw, Nasty, Glock 17 - $600
Beretta 92F - $670
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests