1SGT.Reaper wrote:Heres an idea for you Welshy why don't you pick up a book once and awhile (wanna hear about the 1911s vbeing traded in by Delta, read Special Operations In Iraq by Osprey) and prove your ownself wrong instead of a being a condsencing jerk all the time. From what it seems you like to be right all the time, so instead of arguing with you on either of the points which is futile because im sure you will come up with something. I'll just give up and say that if proving a seventeen year old wrong makes you happy in life, then you got some problems.
So Thanks for playing
Lol, I'd recommend doing some more research than reading one book. I'd recommend looking in to some of the shit that Larry Vickers has written and talked about regarding the 1911, since you know, he was Delta's PRIMARY firearm's instructor. I'd recommend reading things from other Delta armorers as well. A simple Google search should give you all the info you want to know.
The 1911 was phased out in favor of the Glock for three reasons. First was a cost issue. The Glock is much cheaper to maintain, while the 1911 required a lot of constant attention by both the carrier and the unit armorers. Taken together that equals up to a lot of man hours fiddling around with a weapon that doesn't see that much use. Not to mention parts for 1911s were significantly more expensive than those for Glocks.
Second was that Delta (CAG as that point, I suppose) changed its shooting method for handguns. They started using a double tap that is commonly used in the military and law enforcement, meaning 2 center mass, 2 in the head. In a high stress situation, even with CAG guys, you're looking at 5 or 6 rounds expended to do that. If you're packing a 1911, that means you're down to 1 or 2 rounds left, which means that if you turn a corner and need it again, you're upsidedown, or you can stop and reload, giving up the advantage of speed. A Glock on the other hand has a 17 round capacity, and today CAG are using extenders that bump that up a little more to 22 rounds. You do the math. Also, the "stopping power" argument behind the used of the .45 is bullshit.
Third was that they're considerably lighter to carry than 1911s. When you're trying to cut down on weight, which is the name of the game in the military, especially in SOF units, then that is important. To carry a Glock with 51 rounds of ammunition requires 3 magazines. To carry a similar amount of ammo for a 1911 requires 7 magazines.
What I don't think you're getting, probably because you're 17 with a very limited interaction with military personnel, is that handguns are a SECONDARY weapon. Most guys don't want to pack around shit ton of pistol magazines, they'd rather carry rifle mags. If you need to draw your sidearm, you want to be able to fire enough to put down the target AND have more ammunition to engage others, which the 1911 does not offer. All this combined is why CAG switched from the 1911 to the Glock, and a couple minutes of research will support that.
Since you seem either a bit thick or a naive, I'll spoonfeed you. The primary reasons that they switched from 1911s to Glocks wasn't because "fine sand blocked the hurr durr", it was a combination of having the need for a greater magazine capacity, which 1911s just can not provide, and wanting a handgun that required less in the terms of money and man hours to maintain.