by Steve » Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:01 pm
On topic:
The PMCs I worked with wore 5.11 tactical pants (khaki), polo shirts (blue with company logos), Oakley sunglasses and gloves, and plate carriers over soft armor. They carried bone-stock M-4s, no optics, no cans, no bipods, no rails, etc. They carried 5 mags for their rifles. They carried M-9's with 2 spare mags in SERPA drop-leg rigs. And a couple of their "heavies" carried M-240Bs.
Off-topic:
Deployed: 700+ days.
Balls hot: 550+ days.
On fire: 0 days.
Wearing UnderArmour t-shirts underneath A2CUs / Nomex flight suits: Every. Single. Day.
Reality Check: When the vehicle ends up upside down and on fire, the gunner is pretty much guaranteed to be meat paste. If the vehicle ends up upside down, the gunner is likely to be meat paste. If the vehicle hits a mine, the gunner is likely to be meat paste. If the vehicle rolls into a canal because the worthless shitbird Navy E-6 who has been in country for 6 weeks and outside the wire never has a blinding attack of stupidity (R.I.P., Sgt. P.), the gunner is likely to be waterlogged meat paste. If the vehicle stops a RPG, the gunner will likely be either meat paste, sliced up by random shrapnel / spall, or be pretty much unscathed, and not on fire. When the vehicle takes small arms fire, the gunner will likely either be completely unscathed, have one or more limb hits, or end up with nasty torso damage from incoming bullets (that are not on fire).
How likely is it that the gunner is going to die solely because his t-shirt got shrink-wrapped into his torso? How likely is it that the gunner will be so miserable because he is sweating his a$$ off that he isn't paying absolute and total attention to his surroundings?
The no-UnderArmour rule seems completely asinine.
This Week In Airsoft wrote:This Week in Airsoft stands behind its statement... The internet and YouTube can be your teacher.
